Minutes
of the Ohio Historical Records Advisory Board Meeting
5 December 1996
Ohio Historical Center Archives Library
Columbus
Board
members present:Gary
Ness, George Parkinson, Roland Baumann, Jonathan Dembo, Barbara
Floyd, Dennis Harrison, Lynn Jacobs, Michael Lucas, Carol Tomer
Board
members not present: Alice Cornell
Staff
present: Matthew Benz, J.D. Britton
Guest:
Steve George, Executive Director of the Ohio Bicentennial
Commission
State Coordinator
Gary Ness called the meeting to order at 10:09 a.m., and welcomed
the board. New member Lynn Jacobs was introduced to the other
members of the board, who in turn introduced themselves.
Roland Baumann
moved to adopt the minutes of the August meeting as written. Michael
Lucas seconded the motion. The motion carried.
Ness informed
the board on the status of the Ohio Government Information Locator
Service. A t this time, the progress and implementation of the
GILS project depends largely on the outcome of budget negotiations
with the state. A preliminary recommendation from the Office of
State Management and Budget on the Ohio Historical Society's budget
as a whole is expected to be in the Governor's office by the end
of December. Based on this information, it remains to be seen
whether there will be full or partial implantation of GILS.
State Coordinator
Ness then led a discussion on other budget-related items as they
related to the Ohio Historical Society Archives Library and electronic
records.
Deputy Coordinator
George Parkinson then reviewed the remainder of the agenda, and
reported to the board on some of the ongoing projects involving
the Society. These include Access Through Automation,
known as the Capital Project II, and the recent grant
proposal entitled The African American Experience in Ohio.
This project, as put together by staff and submitted to the Library
of Congress/Ameritech National Digital Library Competition, will
be a coherent and chronological collection which represents the
experience of African American's in Ohio from 1850 to 1920.
Parkinson
also updated the board on the continuing process to select and
install an Integrated Library System for the Ohio Historical Society,
the Cincinnati Historical Society and the Western Reserve Historical
Society. The Societies have narrowed the field down to three vendors,
Ameritech, VTLS, and Information Dimension. Parkinson extended
an invitation to the board members to attend the vendor demonstrations
to be held on 22-23 January, 1997.
J.D. Britton,
head of the Society's Local History Office briefed the board on
the progress of the 1996 Historical Records Repository Survey
(HRRS), which OHRAB is cosponsoring along with the Society of
Ohio Archivists (SOA). Britton estimated that 1000 survey forms
have been sent out statewide: 200 to public libraries, 100 to
college and university libraries, 50 to specialized archives,
and 650 to various historical societies, genealogical societies,
sites, preservation groups and museums. So far, there has been
a 20% return rate overall. The board agreed to help with the distribution
of follow-up letters and calls, as well as providing additional
funds to cover the costs of a new mailing.
At noon,
Steve George, Executive Director of the Ohio Bicentennial Commission,
joined the board for lunch. Afterwards, he reported on the status
of the newly established Bicentennial Commission. He explained
to the board that he saw the plans for Ohio's Bicentennial in
the year 2003 falling into five distinct yet related areas, with
each area set up for the wide-range of activities designed for
the inclusion of the people of Ohio.
These five
areas are:
Commemoration:
Recognition of the accomplishments of Ohio and its people in all
88 counties. This could include a wide variety of both statewide
and local projects, but two priorities could be the restoration
of Adena, the home of pioneer and early governor Thomas Worthington,
and the increase of historical markers around the state.
Tapestry:
Basically a wide range of events that will be designed for participation
and engagement by the families of Ohio. Such events would range
from the small - localized projects, or even families urged to
plan their own events, - to the large, such as planned celebrations
in cities, special events, etc. Steve George sees this area -
with its "archival overtones" as one that OHRAB - with
The 2003 Plan - could participate in.
Celebration:
He foresees having opening and closing ceremonies (possible dates:
Fall 2002 through close of year - September 2003) marking the
official beginning and end of the Bicentennial, with perhaps a
statewide holiday decreed for the closing weekend.
Legacy
of Knowledge: The educational mission of the Bicentennial,
which he sees as having many possibilities, among them major art
exhibits, cultural events, technology and science exhibits and
scholarly works, including an update of Ohio Writers, or
possibly the creation of an Ohio Encyclopedia series.
Teaching
of Ohio History: The reinvigoration of the teaching of Ohio
history, with a emphasis on activities designed for the inclusion
of children. For instance, he hopes to see special projects, contests,
and presentations related to Ohio history promoted in the classrooms
of Ohio during the Bicentennial celebration.
Continuing
the discussion, Steve George stressed that he sees OHRAB as an
active participant in the Bicentennial, especially in relation
to the many possible archival aspects of the celebration. Since
he hopes the Bicentennial will provide a "legacy," and
will stand as a project of lasting value to Ohio, he would like
to see the board provide guidance and assistance in elevating
the Bicentennial before the public.
It was suggested
by the board that perhaps a "history fund" could be
established during the Bicentennial, and that such a fund would
be used to grant money to be used for various small projects around
the state, projects that otherwise would go unfinished. Steve
George agreed that such a plan is possible, though he feels such
a program should not be run by the Bicentennial Commission, but
by an separate entity with ties to the Commission. Baumann suggested
using some Bicentennial events to create and provide money for
the fund, i.e.
a small charge for special events, such as
concerts, performances, and exhibits. Consideration was also given
to the possibility that such a fund could continue beyond the
Bicentennial year, and thus provide a "legacy" to future
generations of Ohioans. Lynn Jacobs suggested that the board would
be able to provide strong support for the Bicentennial on local
levels.
The board
also expressed its interest in using the "boost" that
the Bicentennial will provide to create a long lasting public
interest in archival issues. Steve George suggested that The
Ohio 2003 Plan will be presented to the Bicentennial Commission,
and saw OHRAB as being involved in lobbying efforts. Furthermore,
he expressed his interest in endorsing The 2003 Plan as
part of the Bicentennial Commission's plans.
Steve George
finished his presentation by discussing the probable time frame
for implementation of the Bicentennial Commission and plans. By
March of 1997, the full Commission should be seated. He foresees
three biennium's, with the first two years devoted to a planning
phase, with some implementation taking place during that time.
In particular, the second year would involve much of the prep
work. By the third year, the plans would be in full swing. While
no dates have been set as of yet, he predicts that late 1997 will
see some activity.
The board
then discussed the 1997 meeting schedule. Harrison moved and Oda
seconded that the dates and locations listed below, and the motion
carried.
OHRAB Meeting
dates for 1997:
23 January
- Ohio Historical Center
21 March
- Toledo Museum of Art
6 June -
Youngstown Historical Center
22 August
- Cincinnati Historical Society
5 December
- Ohio Historical Center
The board
further agreed to discuss arrangements for meeting with local
historical societies at the 5 December meeting.
Parkinson
made a brief report on the recent rejection of Homefront and
Battlefront by the NHPRC, and suggested that the board take
up discussion on the status of the regrant, at the 23 January
meeting.
The board
concluded the meeting with a demonstration of the Ohio Vital Information
for Libraries (OVIL) project by Assistant State Archivist Charles
Arp and Electronic Records Archivist Janet Carleton. Adjournment
followed at 3:30 p.m.
Respectfully
submitted,
George Parkinson
Deputy Coordinator