Minutes
of the Ohio Historical Records Advisory Board Meeting
6 June 1997
The Youngstown Historical Center of Industry & Labor
Youngstown
Board
members present:George
Parkinson, Roland Baumann, Alice Cornell, Jonathan Dembo, Barbara
Floyd, Dennis Harrison, Michael Lucas, James Oda, Carol Tomer
Board
members not present:Gary Ness, Lynn Jacobs
Staff
present:Matthew Benz, Randall Gooden
Assistant
State Coordinator George Parkinson called the meeting to order
at 10:08 a.m., and welcomed the board.
Parkinson
introduced Randall Gooden, head of the Archives Library Department
at Youngstown. Gooden gave a report on the facilities and collections
of the Archives Library, as well as a brief history of the Youngstown
Historical Center since its opening in 1992.
At this
time, Roland Baumann moved to adopt the postponed minutes of the
23 January meeting and the minutes of the 21 March meeting. Dennis
Harrison seconded. The motion passed.
Discussion
followed on the board's decision to move ahead with a regrant.
Parkinson opened the discussion with a report on the status of
the NHPRC plan. The current plan calls for three strategic goals,
as proposed by the NHPRC Executive Committee, 19 May, 1997:
* continuation
of the founding fathers and institution editing projects now under
progress;
* collaborate with State Historical Records Advisory Boards to
jointly fund programs designed to expand the protection and accessibility
of records;
* continuing to provide leadership in developing, appraising,
preserving, and providing access to records in digital form
.
While this
proposal has yet to be adopted by the NHPRC, Parkinson informed
the board that plans calls for the NHPRC to spend 60% of grant
money on the three priorities listed above; the remaining 40%
will be used for grants that fall outside the scope of the three
priorities, such as manuscript processing projects. Based on that,
Parkinson recommended that OHRAB move ahead with a regrant that
incorporates electronic records. It was also suggested that the
board give some thought to building upon the network of online
historical centers thus creating an extension to other agencies
that are not yet linked. Such a regrant will not only extend online
services to other agencies, but would help to establish an online
"Ohio Digital Archives." This mechanism would allow other societies
and historical facilities to tie materials into a statewide system.
This would involve the processing and electronically reformatting
records and materials.
Alice Cornell
suggested that this regrant presented an opportunity for the board
to focus on images, the preservation/access of which is very popular
with the general public. The image collections could be viewed
through the web or on a CD-ROM, either of which would be very
impressive. James Oda suggested that the appeal of such a project
is that it would give the public a taste of the many collections
found in Ohio archival repositories. It might then bring people
in to the institutions to see the complete collections.
It was mentioned
that copyrights might be problematic when using images. This problem
could be solved by using older photos and images with expired
copyrights. This would of course limit the scope of an image-oriented
project.
Barbara
Floyd expressed some reservation with centering the regrant around
images. Her concern is that any regrant should involve the processing
of collections, as this is a major concern for the archival community.
Dennis Harrison pointed out that such an enormous task would require
large amounts of grant money. Concentrating on images might have
a wider impact with less money. Parkinson suggested that perhaps
the two concerns could addressed by dividing the regrant into
two components: 1) the use of grant money to update descriptions
of the collections to go online, and 2) locating and securing
the use of images for the online collection.
Jonathan
Dembo suggested that the board should find a proposal similar
in scope and content to use as a model for this regrant. Parkinson
said that the National Digital Library is one example of a project
combining collection processing and images.
The discussion
then centered around the need for a theme. Roland Baumann suggested
that the theme should tie in with the Ohio Bicentennial in the
year 2003. While no theme was settled upon, the consensus was
that there is sufficient interest in moving forward with such
a regrant proposal. A committee made up of board members Jonathan
Dembo, Michael Lucas and James Oda was formed to organize the
board's approach to this regrant. Dembo was named Chair.
Alice Cornell
made a motion to appoint the subcommittee to develop the proposal
for further discussion. The motion passed, all in favor.
Parkinson
then reported on the Ohio Bicentennial Commission.
Matthew
Benz reported on the recent completion of the Historical Records
Repository Survey. Camille Maurer and staff of the OHS Data Processing
Department finished the data entry and the results were sent to
Vicky Walch, project coordinator. Walch sent out a status report
on 22 May which confirmed that Ohio had returned 414 completed
forms. OHS staff microfilmed these forms and they will be kept
on file at OHS. Parkinson reported that Walch will present a full
report at the NAGARA (National Association of Government Archives
& Records Administrators) meeting in July. The board also discussed
the possibility of mounting the survey results on the OHRAB web
page.
As reported
at the March meeting, NAGARA has expressed interest in holding
its July 1999 meeting in Columbus. An invitation in OHRAB's name
-along with a resolution of support- was sent to NAGARA. Parkinson
stressed that OHRAB should be involved in the local arrangements
for the NAGARA 1999 meeting.
Parkinson
led the discussion on the board support proposal, which was submitted
to the NHPRC before the 1 June deadline. This proposal will support
the board meeting over the next two years, cover travel and meeting
expenses, as well as pay for revisions and reprinting of The Ohio
2003 Plan. The board thanks OHS Society Relations Division Chief
Jim Strider for his invaluable work on the proposal.
The board
adjourned at 1:55.
Respectfully
submitted,
George Parkinson
Deputy Coordinator